Groce v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis
121 F.2d 800 · 1941
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1972
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zerbst v. Kidwell · Anderson v. Corall · Rosenthal v. New York Life Insurance · United States ex rel. Nicholson v. Dillard · Adams v. Hudspeth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““During the time appellant was incarcerated in the state penitentiary under sentence from the state court, he was not in the custody of the warden under the parole violator’s warrant. The jurisdiction of the Board over him under the original sentence was suspended during such time. While serving the state sentence, he occupied the status of an escaped convict or of one who had not been apprehended.” (Emphasis mine.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kaumeyer v. Steele
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.