Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.2d 897 - Hemphill Co. v. Coe

Hemphill Co. v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.2d 897 · 1941

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
May 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably In re Herr (1967), Lavin v. Pierotti (1942)

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

31019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 31

Relies on In re Wasserfallen · Trumbull v. Kirschbraun · Larson v. Crowther · 14 App. D.C. 255 - In re Barratt's Appeal · In re Dement

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant seeks really to redetermine the question which the decision of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals has concluded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.