Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.2d 905 - Thomas v. United States

Thomas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.2d 905 · 1941

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
11
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 7 district · 68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently April 1993 · most notably Luck v. United States (1965), Pee v. United States (1959)

46 federal appellate · 7 district · 68 state decisions — followed in 11 states

540194119501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Avery v. State of Alabama · United States v. Manton · Isaacs v. United States · Commonwealth v. Fisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would be a serious breach of public faith ... to permit these informal and presumably beneficent procedures to become the basis for criminal records, which could be used to harass a person throughout his life. There is no more reason for permitting their use for such a purpose, than there would be to pry into school records or to compile family and community recollections concerning youthful indiscretions of persons who were fortunate enough to avoid the juvenile court.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““An adjudication upon the status of a child in the jurisdiction of the court does not operate to impose any of the civil disabilities ordinarily imposed by conviction, and a child is not deemed a criminal by reason of an adjudication. An adjudication is not deemed a conviction of a crime, and a child may not be charged with or convicted of a crime in any court, except as provided by section 11-1553.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The authority conferred upon the Attorney General by this section [i.e. section permitting transfers of inmates of one penitentiary or correctional institution to another] shall extend to persons committed to the National Training School for Boys, by the juvenile court of the District of Columbia, as well as to those committed by any court of the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.