Demaurez v. Squier’s Empirical Analysis
121 F.2d 960 · 1941
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1967
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 710
Relies on McNally v. Hill · Holiday v. Johnston · Prussian v. United States · Hall v. Johnston · Beddow v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whether or not the check in question was a pension check or a writing wijhin the provisions of the earlier act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 73 , supra, cannot properly be considered by this court upon this application for writ of habeas corpus for the reason that in either view the cumulative sentence imposed upon the petitioner is good for a term of ten years. Until the petitioner has served that term he cannot seek release by habeas corpus on the theory that the cumulative sentence of fifteen years was, excessive and void as to the first count. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. De Maurez v. Squier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.