United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
121 F.3d 335 · 1997
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez (2002), United States of America v. Richard E. Driver (2001)
19 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Johnson v. United States · Freytag v. Commissioner · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a right is waived, it is not reviewable, even for plain error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“With the advice of counsel and ample opportunity to reflect on the matter, Mr. Davis declined the district court’s invitation to withdraw his guilty plea; he is not entitled to a second bite of the apple by raising on appeal the very matter that he told the district court he did not want to raise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.