Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.3d 44 - Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mayhew

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mayhew’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.3d 44 · 1997

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
July 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Denius v. Dunlap (2000), Securities & Exchange Commission v. Warde (1998)

15 federal appellate ·

2701997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Chiarella v. United States · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Henderson v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] major factor in determining whether information was material is the importance attached to it by those who knew about it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “include any fact 'which in reasonable and objective contemplation might affect the value of the corporation's stock or securities'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]n order for information to be “material” for purposes of § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, there must be a substantial likelihood hat a reasonable investor would view it as significantly altering the “total mix” of information available. This inquiry is guided both by the probability that an event will occur and the anticipated magnitude of the event relative to the totality of the company’s activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.