Lucero v. Trosch’s Empirical Analysis
121 F.3d 591 · 1997
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Al-Site Corporation v. Vsi International Inc (1999), J.M.W. v. T.I.Z. (2011)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 248 (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · University of Texas v. Camenisch · New York Times Company v. United States · Frisby v. Schultz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law, (2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction, (3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, or (4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“arise out of a common nucleus of operative fact with a substantial federal claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.