Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.3d 624 - Dale v. Moore

Dale v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.3d 624 · 1997

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. Burton (2000), Nicholson v. Shafe (2009)

19 federal appellate · 1 district ·

360199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Sumner v. Mata · In re Summers · Metaullics Systems Co. v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the party in federal court is the same as the party in state court; (2) the prior state court ruling was a final or conclusive judgment on the merits; (3) the party seeking relief in federal court had a reasonable opportunity to raise its federal claims in the state court proceeding; and (4) the issue before the federal court was either adjudicated by the state court or was inextricably intertwined with the state court's judgment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[f]ederal district courts may not exercise jurisdiction to decide federal issues which are inextricably intertwined with a state court's judgment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not provide an independent source of federal court jurisdiction that overrides the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.