Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.3d 828 - Nelson v. Walker

Nelson v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.3d 828 · 1997

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Tankleff v. Da Senkowski (1998), Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole (2000)

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

360199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Arizona v. Fulminante · Lindh v. Murphy · Houston v. Lack · Barefoot v. Estelle · Miller v. Fenton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No single criterion controls whether an accused's confession is voluntary: whether a confession was obtained by coercion is determined only after careful evaluation of the totality of the surrounding circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner]; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When reviewing a habeas petition, '[t]he factual findings of the New York Courts are presumed to be correct.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.