Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 FRD 235 - Smith v. BIC Corp.

Smith v. BIC Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1989
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. Heisley · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the information sought by BIC USA from the Inquirer and Burke [was] not relevant to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “plaintiff is entitled to discover all relevant information, ... regardless of its age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.