Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 FSUPP 152 - Hickman v. Tullos

Hickman v. Tullos’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on County of Sonoma v. Hall · Houston v. Holmes · Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York · Ridley v. Young · Franceschi v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the operator is a minor and his parent is willing that he should operate an automobile and desires that he should receive a license authorizing him to do so, then and in that event the parent may sign the application and in doing so he places himself in the same position and under the same statute of limitations as the operator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.