Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 FSUPP2D 758 - Manley v. AmBase Corp.

Manley v. AmBase Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alder v. United States · Bundrick v. United States · Creditors of Micro-Time Management Systems, Inc. v. Allard & Fish, P.C. · Smith v. Lightning Bolt Productions, Inc. · Maiello v. NYS BD. OF PAROLE

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “5. (a) If Manley has been or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to any action, suit or proceeding ... by reason of the fact that he was a director or officer of AmBase or any current or former subsidiary of AmBase, or by reason of the fact that he was serving at the request of AmBase as a director, officer, member, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise ... he shall be indemnified and held harmless by AmBase to the fullest extent authorized by Delaware law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended, against all expense, liability and loss ... reasonably incurred or suffered by Manley in connection therewith, including, without limitation, payment of expenses incurred in defending a Proceeding prior to the final disposition of such Proceeding. (b) If a claim under ¶ 5(a) is not paid in full by AmBase within 30 days after a written claim has been received by the Company, Manley may at any time thereafter bring suit against AmBase to recover the unpaid amount of the claim and, if successful in whole or in part, Manley shall be entitled to be paid also the expense of prosecuting such claim. It shall be a defense to any such action that Manley has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible under Delaware law for the Company to indemnify him for the amount claimed; ;provided however, that the allegations, facts and circumstances which form the basis of any claims that AmBase assert”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Undisputed Facts” section of the parties’ Joint PreTrial Order. 4 . References to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “believed there was a possibility that a substantial judgment would be rendered”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.