Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Ga. App. 739 - Smith v. Bel-Arbor, Inc.

121 Ga. App. 739 - Smith v. Bel-Arbor, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2018

12 state decisions

5019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 110 Ga. App. 170 - Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp. · 121 Ga. App. 259 - Wakefield v. AR Winter Co., Inc. · 121 Ga. App. 98 - Winters v. Morrison's Cafeteria

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the proximate cause of the plaintiff's misfortune is attributable to negligence, it is her own disregard of the hazards involved in walking on a known slippery surface. Recognizing that ordinarily negligence, proximate cause, and related issues are matters for jury determination, we consider it to be the duty of the courts, in a clear and palpable case, as here, where the facts are undisputed, and where the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is clearly and indisputably her own conduct, with full awareness of the danger involved, to dispose of the case as a matter of law without resort to trial by jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no emergency whereby the plaintiff was required to make use of the hallway[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.