Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Haw. 451 - State v. Corder

State v. Corder’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Arceo · State v. Robins · State v. Israel · State v. Reed · State v. Balanza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court has the discretion to order a bill of particulars, and it must exercise this discretion in consideration of the purpose of a bill of particulars, which is to help the defendant prepare for trial and to prevent surprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “accused shall enjoy the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation[,] ... a charge must be in a legally sufficient form which correctly advises the defendant about the allegations against him or her”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was within its discretion to find that the Complaint, the EOP and the police reports were sufficient to apprise Corder of the charges against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.