State v. Lavy’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
79 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably State v. Severson (2009), Nellsch v. State (1992)
79 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Toohill · State v. Broadhead · State v. Fodge · United States v. Stead · United States v. Michaelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Withdrawal of plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty may be made only before sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended; but to correct manifest injustice the court after sentence may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his plea.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dopp · State v. Dye“[Ijssues not raised in the trial court cannot later be raised on appeal, State v. Mauro, [ 121 Idaho 178 , 824 P.2d 109 (1991) ]; State v. Martin, 119 Idaho 577 , 808 P.2d 1322 (1991), unless the alleged error would constitute ‘fundamental error.’ State v. Mauro, [supra], State v. White, 97 Idaho 708 , 551 P.2d 1344 (1976); State v. Grob, 107 Idaho 496 , 690 P.2d 951 (Ct.App.1984). Fundamental error is error ‘which so profoundly distorts the trial that it produces manifest injustice and deprives the accused of his fundamental right to due process.’ State v. Mauro, [supra]; State v. Morris, 116 Idaho 834 , 780 P.2d 156 (Ct.App.1989); State v. Koch, 115 Idaho 176 , 765 P.2d 687 (Ct.App.1988).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dopp · State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.