121 Ill. App. 2d 191 - Klein v. Ickovitz’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably 98 Ill. App. 3d 6 - Kurek v. State Oil Co. (1981), 249 Ill. App. 3d 415 - La Salle National Bank v. 53rd-Ellis Currency Exchange, Inc. (1993)
3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Finally, defendant challenges plaintiff’s authority to bring this action, arguing that the holder of the title is the proper plaintiff. This court, however, has upheld the right of a land trust beneficiary-lessor to maintain an action for rent. Bellows v. Ziv, 38 IllApp2d 342, 187 NE2d 265 . See also Jakovljevich v. Alvarez, 113 IllApp2d 302, 252 NE2d 60 . We see no reason why this principle should not be applicable to rent accruing subsequent to eviction, since the lease agreement expressly states that the lessee’s duty to pay rent survives a forcible detainer proceeding, and the validity of such a provision is well established. See Grommes v. St. Paul Trust Co., 147 Ill 634, 35 NE 820 ; Vintaloro v. Pappas, 310 Ill 115, 141 NE 377 ; Klein v. Ickovitz, 72 IllApp2d 59, 219 NE2d 73 . The obligation to pay rent is not dependent upon title in the lessor, but is governed by the lease agreement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.