Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 KAN 436 - State v. Snow

State v. Snow’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1982

5 state decisions

201926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Stewart · Dukes v. State · State v. Keehn · State of Kansas v. Roberts · Fields v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is your duty and you should consider whatever threats were made, if you find any were made, by Arthur Seals of personal violence to the defendant, and which threats were communicated to the defendant, if you find they were communicated to him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.