State v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
2 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2006
2 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Nielsen · State v. Colgate · State v. Chinault · State v. Ford · State v. Supancic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . a single offense cannot be split into separate parts, and the supposed offender be prosecuted for each of such separate parts, although each part may of itself constitute a separate offense. If the offender be prosecuted for one part, that ends the [prosecution] for that offense, provided, such part of itself constitutes an offense for which a conviction can be had. And generally we would think that the commission of a single wrongful act can furnish the subject matter or the foundation of only one criminal prosecution. . . .” (p. 515.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gauger““One may sell liquor without having possession of it, and may have unlawful possession of liquor without selling it. [State v. Supancic, 117 Kan. 110 , 230 Pac. 306 .].” (p. 698.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.