Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 LA 1051 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1967

20 state decisions

701908191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Nash · State v. Duffy · State v. Freddy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The authorities discountenance continuances on the ground of the absence of witnesses who are not within the process of the court. In such cases an affirmative showing should be made strong enough to convince the court that the evidence is material and admissible; that due diligence has been exercised ; and ,thát the absent witnesses can and will be produced at the future time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.