Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

121 Mass. 107

Lathrop v. Bowen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 5, 1876

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1876-10-05

Replevin of a horse, buggy and harness, of the value of f 125, Trial in the Central District Court of Worcester, the judge of which allowed a bill of exceptions in substance as follows: The writ was returnable December 11,1875; service was made by E. J. Russell, deputy sheriff, and the approval of the replevin bond was signed “ E. J. Russell.” On February 15,1876, the defendant filed an answer claiming the ownership and right of possession of the property, and denying that…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1892

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1876-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1The District Court, by the express terms of the act establishing it, has jurisdiction of civil actions in which the property replevied does not exceed $300 in value. St. 1872, e. 199, § 9. The motion to dismiss, after answering to the merits, was too late. Simonds v. Parker, 1 Met. 508. By our law, replevin lies for the unlawful detention of goods lawfully taken. Gen. Sts. c. 143, § 10. Esson v. Tarbell, 9 Cush. 407. The instructions were correct and sufficient

¶2JF* ceptions^overruled.

/121/mass/107 · .json · Public domain