121 Md. App. 263 - Simpson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Holbrook v. State (2001), Laney v. State (2004)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Roviaro v. United States · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant next contends that because he went to Rogers’s room to have sexual relations, and because society believes that sexual relations should be carried out in private, he therefore had a subjective expectation of privacy in Rogers’s bedroom sufficient to confer standing. The State contends that appellant’s connection with the room, even if appellant were to be believed, was insufficient to allow him sufficient expectation of privacy to have standing. State. We agree with the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The burden is on the proponent of a motion to suppress evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds to prove what is sometimes called “standing” — that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises or the property.... [T]he motion court in this case found that the appellant did not show that he had standing to assert a Fourth Amendment violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“more than a subjective expectation of not being discovered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.