Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 MICH 270 - Jossman v. Rice

Jossman v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
February 1933
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1933

14 state decisions

5018991900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reske v. Reske · Mills v. Hobbs · Deville v. Widoe · Burkhart v. Reisig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And in case the title * * * is held by husband and wife jointly, the lien given by this act shall attach to such lands and improvements, if the improvements be made in pursuance of a contract with both of them, or in pursuance of a contract with one of them by and with the knowledge and consent of the other.” Section 2, Act No. 179, Pub. Acts 1891.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.