Kemp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1994
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as charged. When counsel for appellant moved the court for a peremptory instruction and discharge of the appellant for the reason that the state had failed to prove the adultery as alleged in the indictment, the court permitted the district attorney, on motion, to amend the indictment by striking out the words”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Thereupon the case went to the jury, resulting in a conviction, and this action of the court is assigned here as reversible error. The indictment was drawn under section 1029, Code of 1906 (section 754, Hemingway's Code), which provides that,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“but it may be proved by circumstances which show habitual sexual intercourse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.