majority"> MONTGOMERY, J.:

Marion Powell and Lula Powell were indicted for a conspiracy to procure the seduction and defilement of Lilly Lawrance, a young unmarried woman eighteen years of age, and living, just before the offence charged, with her father. The male defendant alone was tried. The defendant’s first exception was to the sufficiency of the indictment, it having been insisted that the bill charged no offence. There is nothing in this exception. The' matter was set out in approved form (Form 654, 2 Wharton Forms), and the offence charged was that of a conspiracy to seduce and defile a young unmarried woman, which is a crime indictable at common law. Wharton Am. Crim. Law, Sec. 2317; 2 McClain Crim. Law, Section 959.

The only other exception was to the refusal of his Honor to charge the jury, at the request of the defendant, that there was not sufficient evidence upon - which they could reasonably find a verdict of guilty against the defendant. His Honor properly refused to give the instruction. There was evidence going to show that the prosecutrix was unmarried and eighteen yeai's old and living with her father; that the female defendant was a married woman, her husband being the brother of the other defendant, Marion Powell, *637 who himself was a married man; that the female defendant sent for the prosecutrix who lived a mile or more away, at her father’s house, to come to her house to help her about-some house work; that after she arrived the defendant Marion told her that if Joe, his brother, and the husband of Lula, did not pay her for her work, he would; that during the week she stayed at the female defendant’s house, and repeated importunities were made by the defendants to the prosecutrix that she would go with them to the store of Marion in Tennessee, about ten miles off; that the defendants were constantly engaged in close conversation with each other, and immediately afterwards would try again to persuade the prosecutrix to go with them to Tennessee; that finally the prosecutrix consented to go, she and the defendant Lula taking one road, and Marion another, and meeting-after they had gotten out of the neighborhood; that after they got to Tennessee the defendant Marion had intercourse-with the prosecutrix.

There is a good deal more of such testimony, and certainly there was enough to have been submitted to the jury on the question of the defendant’s guilt.

No error..

Citation profile

How this case has been treated — in progress