121 N.C. App. 161 - Chiltoski v. Drum’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2019
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Freid v. McGrath · 9 N.C. App. 587 - GLEN FOREST CORPORATION v. Bensch · 87 N.C. App. 591 - Garrison v. Garrison · 51 N.C. App. 500 - Seaman v. McQueen · 19 N.C. App. 357 - In Re the Will of Herring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While an order for new trial pursuant to Rule 59 ... may ordinarily be reversed on appeal only in the event of a manifest abuse of discretion, when the trial court grants or denies a new trial due to some error of law,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Not later than 10 days after entry of judgment the court of its own initiative, on notice to the parties and hearing, may order a new trial for any reason for which it might have granted a new trial on motion of a party, and in the order shall specify the grounds therefor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Otherwise ... the record will not reveal the basis upon which the order is made or permit intelligent review by an appellate court.”); N.D. R. Civ. P. 59(f) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.