State v. Woodward’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
206 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 208 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Rojo (1998), State v. Varela (1999)
206 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Ohio v. Roberts · White v. Illinois · State v. Apodaca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 208 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly untenable or not justified by reason.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he purpose of [Rule] 11-403 is not to guard against the danger of any prejudice whatever, but only against the danger of unfair prejudice. A statement is not unfairly prejudicial simply because it inculpates the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gaitan · State v. Otto“[w]e must reverse a conviction when the cumulative impact of errors [that] occurred at trial was so prejudicial that the defendant was deprived of a fair trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garvin · State v. Jacobs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.