State v. Borja-Guzman’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2023
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Bratton v. United States · Swafford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The various means of trafficking and the broad definition of deliver evinces a legislative intent to authorize prosecution and punishment for each separate transfer of a controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ontiveros v. Dorsey“'deliver' means the actual, constructive or attempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ontiveros v. Dorsey“distribution, sale, barter or giving away of any controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ontiveros v. Dorsey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.