State v. Landgraf’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Ervin v. State (1999), House v. Hatch (2008)
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Purkett v. Elem · Whalen v. United States · Bell v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“recognized and acknowledged the continuing validity of its prior decisions that expert testimony is admissible even if it touches upon an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres“A sentence may be properly aggravated based on events surrounding the crimes and the nature of a defendant's threat to society.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quintana“`The means of committing an offense may not be [used] to multiply the number of offenses committed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Santillanes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.