Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 N.M. 636 - Chappell v. Cosgrove

Chappell v. Cosgrove’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon (1999), Sanders v. Rosenberg (1996)

2 district · 23 state decisions

1501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1654

Relies on 186 W. Va. 195 - Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc. · 19 Kan. App. 2d 740 - LeaseAmerica Corp. v. Stewart · Skeen v. Chase Manhattan Bank · Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n attorney may not be disqualified under Rule 16-307 absent a showing by the party seeking disqualification ■ that the attorney’s testimony is material to an issue in the case, that the evidence to be elicited from the attorney’s testimony is not available from another source, and that the attorney’s testimony is potentially prejudicial to his client’s case. 36”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[N]either the writ of prohibition nor the writ of superintending control should be used as a substitute for a decision on direct or interlocutory appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an issue of first impression ... without clear answers under New Mexico law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.