121 Ohio App. 3d 263 - Summers v. Summers’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2026
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 18 Ohio App. 2d 159 - Croston v. Croston · Wendell v. AmeriTrust Co. · 139 Ohio St. 361 - Ohio National Bank v. Boone · Ohio National Bank v. Adair · 148 Ohio St. 675 - McCulloch v. Yost
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`1. In the construction of a will, the sole purpose of the court should be to ascertain and carry out the intention of the testator. {¶ 14}”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.