121 Ohio App. 3d 673 - State v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2025
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · Dusky v. United States · Moran v. Burbine · State v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'some reliable, credible evidence supporting the trial court's conclusion that [the defendant] understood the nature and objective of the proceedings against him.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“an appellate court will not disturb the trial court's exercise of discretion absent a showing that the accused has suffered material prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] defendant is presumed to be competent to stand trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Laghaoui
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.