State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. Williams (2011), State v. Chiominto (2009)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers · 45 Ohio St. 2d 366 - State v. Gibson · State v. Brooke · State v. Brandon · Ruf v. Ruf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“merely by establishing that he or she had been convicted without representation. For one thing, it is beyond dispute that a person has a constitutional right to represent himself or herself; therefore, it is not possible to establish a constitutional infirmity merely by showing that a person did not have counsel. See Section 10, Article I, Ohio Constitution; State v. Gibson (1976), 45 Ohio St.2d 366 , 74 O.O.2d 525 , 345 N.E.2d 399 , paragraph one of the syllabus. Furthermore, in State v. Brandon (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 85 , 543 N.E.2d 501 , syllabus, we stated,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Troyer · State v. Bigelow“in Brooke encompassed the combined definition, not the first alone. Thus, a defendant cannot establish a prima facie showing as to”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Troyer · State v. Bigelow“limitations in the English language with respect to being both specific and manageably brief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Troyer · State v. Bigelow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.