Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Or. 4 - Hill v. Hartzell

Hill v. Hartzell’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 1949
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rodgers v. United States · Crane v. Reeder · Marsden v. Harlocker · State v. Port of Tillamook · State ex rel. Weber v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * Courts ought to be, and are, very reluctant to interfere with the will of the people as expressed at an election, but cannot validate an election of this character wherein there has been a total failure to follow the plain and explicit mandate of the statute as specifically pointed out by this court in Briggs v. Stevens, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.