Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Or. App. 25 - Eulrich v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

121 Or. App. 25 - Eulrich v. Snap-On Tools Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 53 Cal. 2d 195 - Leeper v. Beltrami · Sheets v. Knight · Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home Insurance · Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co. · Paulson v. Western Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"the field manager rode along with plaintiff and actually conducted sales on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff's supervisor did all of his paperwork for the first month, and continued to do some of that paperwork throughout plaintiff's tenure as a dealer. * * * There was also evidence that defendants promised to `take care of their dealers and exercised complete control over how the business was run and over the size and location of the dealer's territory." Eulrich, 121 Or.App. at 37 , 853 P.2d 1350 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “subject to a standard of care independent of the terms of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.