121 Or. App. 362 - State v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1998
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Owens · State v. Davis · State v. Ainsworth · State v. Paulson · State v. Busby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The evidence supports a finding that the officers began searching for and seizing evidence well before defendant signed the consent form. The officers invaded defendant's constitutionally protected privacy interests when they began searching and seizing evidence without a warrant, without consent and without any other exception to the warrant requirements of Article I, section 9, and the Fourth Amendment. The fact that defendant subsequently consented does not vitiate the unlawfulness of a search and seizure that violated the state and federal constitutions at its inception." State v. Weaver, supra, 121 Or.App. at 366 , 854 P.2d 962 (footnote omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weaver“"when the search began, it was unauthorized. The trial court and the majority say that that fact ends the inquiry. They err because they fail to consider whether the search and seizure that occurred before the consent was signed fall within the purview of the consent. * * * A knowing consent made subsequent to the inception of the search and seizure could relate back to the beginning of the search and act as a waiver of defendant's section 9 rights regarding the privacy interests that were invaded before the consent form was signed." Id. at 371-72, 854 P.2d 962 (Edmonds, J., dissenting).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Weaver“"I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THESE OFFICERS TO SEIZE ANY ARTICLE WHICH THEY CONSIDER TO BE OF VALUE AS EVIDENCE. "THIS STATEMENT IS SIGNED OF MY OWN FREE WILL WITHOUT ANY THREATS OR PROMISES HAVING BEEN MADE TO ME."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Weaver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.