121 Or. App. 460 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A medical doctor is not precluded from testifying as to her medical diagnosis simply because the jury may infer from that testimony that another witness is or is not telling the truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Nooth“We expressly hold that in Oregon a witness, expert or otherwise, may not give an opinion on whether he believes a witness is telling the truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Nooth“Although, if believed, Bays' testimony supported the child's testimony, that does not render it a direct comment on the child's credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Nooth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.