Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 P.3d 1210 - DLS v. Maybin

DLS v. Maybin’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Folsom v. Burger King · 125 Wash. 2d 500 - King v. Riveland · Folsom v. Burger King · 20 Wash. App. 98 - Adamski v. Tacoma General Hospital · 68 Wash. 2d 1 - Greene v. Rothschild

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Apparent agency occurs, and vicarious liability for the principal follows, where a principal makes objective manifestations leading a third person to believe the wrongdoer is an agent of the principal. Restatement, (Second) of Agency § 267 (1957). The doctrine is intended to protect third parties who justifiably rely upon the belief that another is the agent of a principal. The doctrine has three basic requirements: the actions of the putative principal must lead a reasonable person to conclude the actors are employees or agents; the plaintiff must believe they are agents; and the plaintiff must, as a result, rely upon their care or skill, to her detriment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “must have a subjective belief that the agent is acting for the principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.