DLS v. Maybin’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Folsom v. Burger King · 125 Wash. 2d 500 - King v. Riveland · Folsom v. Burger King · 20 Wash. App. 98 - Adamski v. Tacoma General Hospital · 68 Wash. 2d 1 - Greene v. Rothschild
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Apparent agency occurs, and vicarious liability for the principal follows, where a principal makes objective manifestations leading a third person to believe the wrongdoer is an agent of the principal. Restatement, (Second) of Agency § 267 (1957). The doctrine is intended to protect third parties who justifiably rely upon the belief that another is the agent of a principal. The doctrine has three basic requirements: the actions of the putative principal must lead a reasonable person to conclude the actors are employees or agents; the plaintiff must believe they are agents; and the plaintiff must, as a result, rely upon their care or skill, to her detriment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“must have a subjective belief that the agent is acting for the principal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.