State v. Rooth’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in the record indicates that the trial court intended to sentence in accord with the information but, through some clerical error, it wrongfully sentenced Rooth. Perhaps if the verdict forms had identified the firearm, . . . there would be a basis to address clerical error. But that is not evident from the record.[ 55 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`whether the judgment, as amended, embodies the trial court's intention, as expressed in the record at trial. '”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.