Koenig v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Godinez v. Moran · Miles v. Dorsey · Nixon v. State · State v. Shouse · DeShazer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] diagnosis of a recognized mental illness [does not] automatically render[ ] a person incompetent to enter a guilty plea”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“■ His 'broad claim that he suffers from bipolar disorder ... is insufficient to establish he was incompetent to knowingly and voluntarily enter his guilty "pleas, (in■ternal citation omitted). [O]ur review of the record supports a finding that Koenig’s guilty pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. The transcript from the change of plea hearing reveals the district court very carefully complied with the mandates of W.R.Cr.P. 11____[T]he district court thoroughly advised Koenig of his rights and the ramifications of his decision to plead guilty. Koenig indicated his understanding of the charges and their attendant penalties, the -consequences of his guilty pleas, and the rights he would relinquish if he entered those pleas. We are satisfied Koenig was true to his word when he stated- to the court he was -entering his pleas voluntarily and of his own free will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.