¶1 (dissenting) I think that the remark of the Circuit Judge was the involuntary expression of the impression which the testimony had made upon his mind, which, coming from one who naturally from his exalted station wielded great influence, was prejudicial to the; right of the defendant to be tried by the law and the evidence alone.
121 S.C. 117
113 S.E 581
Rumler v. Gantt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 1, 1922
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1922-09-01
Decided 1922-09-01