Pittman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 986 So. 2d 928 - Moore v. State · 781 So. 2d 109 - Meeks v. State · 879 So. 2d 423 - Bell v. State · 836 So. 2d 779 - Pittman v. State · Marshall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant is entitled to a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence where: (1) such evidence will probably change the outcome if a new trial is granted; (2) the evidence has been discovered since trial and could not have been discovered before trial by the exercise of due diligence; (3) the evidence is material to the issue; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative or impeaching.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The defendant must satisfy all four elements before a reversal can be granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.