Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · 360 So. 2d 1206 - Bell v. State · 637 So. 2d 871 - Perry v. State · 687 So. 2d 1124 - Foster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[An indictment] must contain the essential facts constituting the offense charged ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“affected the outcome of his trial. However, Bender fails to assert any facts or legal authority to support his claim. See id. Notwithstanding the procedural bar, we find no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct. Therefore, we find no merit to this issue. VII. The Indictment ¶ 17. Bender challenges the sufficiency of his indictment in support of a JNOV or a new trial. The purpose of an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“indictment is to give the defendant fair notice of the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.