Webb v. Roofing Analytics, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co. · 434 So. 2d 1067 - Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield · Carriere v. Pee Wee's Equipment Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An independent contractor relationship presupposes a contract between parties for a specific piecework as a unit to be done according to the independent contractor’s own methods, without control and direction by the principal except as to the final result. The independent contractor’s work is of an independent nature allowing him to employ nonexclusive means in accomplishing it. As agreed upon by the parties, there is a specific price for the undertaking, and there is a specific time or duration. Neither side may terminate or discontinue at will without risk of incurring liability for the breach. .[Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hopper v. Austin“It is incumbent upon the party who contends its evidence was improperly excluded to make a proffer, and if it fails to do so, it waives its right to complain of the exclusion on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.