Parrish v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Cotton · Payne v. Tennessee · Tuilaepa v. California · Commonwealth v. English
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These instructions do not violate the statutory system, nor do they invade the province of the jury. Instruction No. 7 followed the one in 1 CoopeR, Kentucky Instructions To Juries (Criminal) § 12.08 (4th ed. 1999). We find this to be a proper statement of the law. The instructions allowed the jury to consider options other than death, even when a finding is made as to aggravating circumstances. Wilson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 836 S.W.2d 872 (1992). There was no error and no violation of either the federal or state constitutions. Instruction No. 7 did not, as Parrish asserts, instruct the jurors that they should impose the death penalty unless they had a reasonable doubt that death was the appropriate penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. Commonwealth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.