Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 SW3D 378 - M.L.J. v. Johnson

M.L.J. v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co. · Bowden v. Ward · Wells v. Tennessee Board of Regents

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence must eliminate any serious or substantial doubt about the correctness of the conclusions to be drawn from the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.