¶1The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in this case is in conflict with that of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District in the case of Johnson v. Chapman Milling Co., 37 S. W. (2d) 776.. We are convinced, however, that the opinion of the first named court in the instant case is correct, and that the questions at issue have been definitely settled by this court in the cases of Patty-*196Joiner v. Cummins, 93 Texas, 598, 57 S. W., 566, and Haijek v. Luck, 96 Texas, 517, 74 S. W., 305. We accordingly refuse the application for writ of error.
121 Tex. 195
Johnson v. Star
Decided March 23, 1932
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1932-03-23
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1965
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-03-23
View the full empirical analysis of this case →