Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 U.S. 215 - Francklyn v. Sprague

Francklyn v. Sprague’s Empirical Analysis

121 U.S. 215 · 1887

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1987 · most notably Hooper v. Yoder (1987), Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. Lombard (1904)

8 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

9018871890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoyt v. Sprague · Nixon v. Long · Lessee of Hewes v. McDowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Now, can it be justly contended that these debts due to the several partners, when they became the assumed debts of the corporation, continued to be liens on the property, as they had been when it was partnership property? We think not. This would have been subversive of the whole plan. The relation of the parties to the property was entirely changed. Their lien as partners, as well as their character of partners, was extinguished. A conveyance or release of property by one who has a lien on it necessarily extinguishes the lien. Mary Sprague, as administratrix and guardian, after conveying to the corporation all her interest and the interest of her wards in the property, parted with all right in it, and accepted in lieu of it shares for her aliquot part in the body of it, and the assumption and engagement of the corporation to pay the balance due to her on the accounts. Having conveyed and parted with the property by virtue of an authority conferred by law, her lien upon it was gone; and those who claim through and under her cannot set up any such lien.” 121 U. S. 228 , 7 Sup. Ot. 957, 30 L. Ed. 936 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.