Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 U.S. 421 - Carson v. Dunham

Carson v. Dunham’s Empirical Analysis

121 U.S. 421 · 1887

Citation profile

317
cited by 317 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 47 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 317 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2014 · most notably Ex Parte: Edward T Young (1908), Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co. (1921)

51 federal appellate · 47 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 10 states

58018871890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Proffitt v. Florida · Stone v. State of South Carolina · Starin v. Mayor Etc of the City of New York Independent Steam-Boat Co · Gold-Washing and Water Company v. Keyes · Reggel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 317 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"And under section 2 of that act, which provided that any suit of a civil nature, at law or in equity, brought in any state court, ‘and arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States, or treaties made or which shall lie made under their authority,’ might be removed by either party into the Circuit Court of the United States, it was held sufficient to justify a removal by the defendant that the record at the time of the removal, showed that either party claimed a right under the Constitution or laws of the "United States.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The answer was germane to the petition, and did no more than set forth in proper form what had before been imperfectly stated. To that extent, we think, it was proper to amend a petition which, on its face, showed a right to the transfer.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Before, therefore, a Circuit Court can bo required; to retain a cause under this jurisdiction, it must in some form appear upon the record, by a statement of tacts, ‘in legal and logical form,’ such as is required in good pleading, that the suit is one which really and substantially involves a dispute or controversy as to a right which depends upon the construction or «fleet of the Constitution, or some law or treaty of the United States.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.