Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Utah 279 - Taylor v. Waddoups

Taylor v. Waddoups’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2012

15 state decisions

501952196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jensen v. Earley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interest and welfare of the child be given paramount consideration in all cases involving the custody of children.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The person adopting a child and the child adopted, and the other persons whose consent is necessary, must appear before the district court of the county where the person adopting resides, and the necessary consent must thereupon be signed and an agreement be executed by the person adopting to the effect that the child shall be adopted and treated in all respects as his own lawful child....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The court must examine all persons appearing before it pursuant to the preceding provisions, each separately, and, if satisfied that the interests of the child will be promoted by the adoption, it must make an order declaring that the child shall thenceforth be regarded and treated in all respects as the child of the person adopting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.