121 Wash. 2d 214 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. (2001), 127 Wash. 2d 401 - Goodman v. Boeing Co. (1995)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Walker v. Illinois · 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan · 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak · 100 Wash. 2d 131 - State v. Ferguson · 92 Wash. 2d 285 - Stewart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The pertinent inquiry on review is whether the exception was sufficient to apprise the trial judge of the nature and substance of the objection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Before instructing the jury, the court shall supply counsel with copies of its proposed instructions which shall be numbered. Counsel shall then be afforded an opportunity in the absence of the jury to make objections to the giving of any instruction and to the refusal to give a requested instruction. The objector shall state distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection, specifying the number, paragraph or particular part of the instruction to be given or refused and to which objection is made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'to clarify . . . the exact points of law and reasons upon which counsel argues the court is committing error about a particular instruction.’ ” Walker v. State, 121 Wn.2d 214, 217 , 848 P.2d 721 (1993) (quoting Stewart v. State, 92 Wn.2d 285, 298 , 597 P.2d 101 (1979)). Another purpose is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.